The information provide is not the important issue of the birth certificate controversy. There are several main issue that needs to be explained by the president. First, why did it take so long to produce this document. This fiasco could have ended long time ago if Obama show us his birth certificate. Second, if the Gov. of Hawaii, who bragged he can provide Obama birth certificate, was unable to locate the document, how did couple Obama aides were able to find it? And third, why did the president pay millions in legal fees to hide his birth certificate, his school record, and other documents explaining his past. I thought he was going to be the most transparent president in history. Yeah, right!
(The Smoking Gun) So here’s a few nutty points about the birth certificate sure to be seized upon by the nonbelievers:
• If the original document was in a bound volume (as reflected by the curvature of the left hand side of the certificate), how can the green patterned background of the document's safety paper be so seamless?
• Why, if Obama was born on August 4, 1961, was the “Date Accepted by Local Reg.” four days later on August 8, 1961?
• What is the significance of the smudges in the box containing the name of the reported attendant?
• David A. Sinclair, the M.D. who purportedly signed the document, died nearly eight years ago at age 81. So he is conveniently unavailable to answer questions about Obama’s reported birth.
• In the “This Birth” box there are two mysterious Xs above “Twin” and “Triplet.” Is there a sibling or two unaccounted for?
• What is the significance of the mysterious numbers, seen vertically, on the document’s right side?
• Finally, the “Signature of Local Registrar” in box 21 may be a desperate attempt at establishing the document’s Hawaiian authenticity. Note to forgers: It is spelled “Ukulele.”
No comments:
Post a Comment